If you think this way, you’ve definitely been poisoned by misinformation, now coming from the highest levels of your government and scientific bodies. Real proven science is against such fallacies. There is absolutely ZERO proof that by having any vaccine (or any other medicine) you’re actually and actively protecting others from infections. On the other hand, there is big data proving that even if you have had a vaccine, you’ll still get the disease, and maybe die with the infection. Thinking that you’re saving someone else other than yourself by getting vaccinated with an RNA vaccine is completely flawed and dangerous for your overall health. You don’t know anything about how your body works, and this can get you in situations when you’ll even inject poison into your veins thinking that you’re protecting someone else.
Vaccines are alternative medicine against pathogens. There are two types of vaccines: based on whole purified virus, and based on immunoglobulin. The latter is for the immunocompromised, people that cannot produce their own immunity, or are struggling to produce it. For the healthy there are RNA vaccines. For the rest, the therapies should be different. For most viruses healthy people DO NOT NEED A VACCINE. A vaccine is an injectable solution meant to trigger an immune response. The whole virus vaccines contains inactivated virus (cannot infect live cells) which was stripped of the dangerous proteins on the surface used to penetrate the membrane of the human cell.
Can getting a vaccine protect others?
The only way to protect the others from a coronavirus is to not be infected (with symptoms). Whether you have a vaccine or not, it will not reduce the spread, or stop you from getting infected. You having the vaccine will not protect others. This is a completely flawed argument to live by. A vaccine will stimulate your body to produce a certain immunity. That will give you a certain protection against the real virus, but it cannot compare with someone that has developed immunity after contracting the real virus. Remember that vaccines contain three-four strains of the weakened real virus, hence the artificially-stimulated immunity will also match the “opponent”. When you have specific antibodies you are immune. This is the only way to protect others, by being immune. When you are immune you are no threat for anyone, and you don’t need a vaccine every year. Vaccines every year will cause the severe deterioration of your natural immune system.
Should I have the vaccine if I have specific antibodies?
The short and right answer is NO! This is the pure definition of immunity. I have specific antibodies against the pathogen, therefore I am immune. This is why we have tests for immunity. Even if you don’t have any medical knowledge, it is very easy to understand that this here is pure madness. This is why these trials of the mRNA vaccines are totally flawed: they did not test the patients beforehand to see if they already had specific immunity, before injecting them. They all came from the real world, and they were not isolated before and during the trials. These omissions were intentional, as a real scientist would’ve checked this aspect before any study. If you already have specific antibodies you do no need more antibodies. This is outrageous. Getting artificially reinfected on purpose could even kill you. A vaccine would only confuse and hurt your body, forcing the system to work extra for no benefits. Don’t forget that no matter the vaccine, it’ll shorten your lifespan with a certain amount. Any artificial medicine you take will also have a negative impact on your body.
Are the mRNA vaccines actually vaccines?
Well, let’s see if you agree. A vaccine is medication meant to directly stimulate your immune system to produce specific immunity in your blood. The mRNA molecule has a different purpose: to bypass the immune system, go inside the cell and rewrite the natural expression of your cell. Your own cells will then start producing this alien protein. So, the mRNA molecule has no role in activating the immune system directly, your cells will trigger the alarm by acting differently. You will develop specific immunity against your own spike-spewing cells, while other parts of the immune system will gobble up the discard (the spike protein). Hence doctors not developing specific immunity against the real coronavirus after two doses. The mRNA “vaccines” are not vaccines, based on the definition of the vaccine. They are gene therapy by any standards. The molecule does not necessarily need to deliver the RNA to the nucleus to be considered gene therapy. Gene therapies are changing the natural expression of your body. The official documents from the companies producing the mRNA therapies also confirm it. The closest terminology to vaccines that we can use is therapies, but under no circumstances vaccines. And there is a high chance that the RNA can be delivered to the nucleus of the cell, as described in the documents of a gene therapy using mDNA to deliver a healthy gene in children with SMA. The company is called ZOLGENSMA, a child company of Novartis. Go check them out. These mRNA “vaccines” are actually gene therapies.
CONCLUSION:
No, you will not keep anyone safe by having a vaccine. Plus, you will shed dangerous particles around you for years even, actually putting people at risk, especially the immunocompromised. In my informed opinion, the vaccinated will be more dangerous than the unvaccinated and there is no doubt about it. There is also a high chance that you will form new modified viruses when you get any coronavirus, increasing the number of infectious pathogens in nature exponentially. This is to give you a rough idea of what you’ve done by accepting a therapy you know nothing about.
